All
⭐ Landmark
? Constitutional Law
? Criminal Law (IPC/BNS)
? Civil Law (CPC)
????? Family Law
? Cyber Law (IT Act)
? Corporate Law
? Tax Law
? Labour & Employment Law
? Environmental Law
? Intellectual Property
? Banking & Finance
?? Consumer Protection
? Human Rights
? Land & Property Law
? Arbitration & ADR
? DPDP Act / Data Privacy
? AI & Technology Law
? Media & Communication Law
?? Election Law
? Service & Administrative Law
Showing 6 of 6 judgements
⭐
🏛️ SC
? AI & Technology Law
C.A. No. 11950/2025
Question(s):
(i) Whether the judgments of the NCLT and NCLAT, which relied on six AI-generated citations later found to be either wholly non-existent or attributed with non-existent paragraphs, c
⭐
🏛️ SC
? Constitutional Law
2026 INSC 483 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 536 OF 2026
A judgment of the Supreme Court of India dated May 12, 2026, corresponding to Diary No. 13088 of 2026. The text of the judgment is corrupted and unreadable, preventing further extraction of legal issues or rulings.
⭐
🏛️ SC
? Criminal Law (IPC/BNS)
SLP(Crl.) No.16221/2025
This is a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed before the Supreme Court of India under Article 136 of the Constitution. Due to the encrypted/corrupted nature of the text excerpt, the specific parties, facts, and final decision of the Court are not readable. The petition represents an invocation of the Apex Court's extraordinary criminal appellate jurisdiction.
⭐
🏛️ SC
? Criminal Law (IPC/BNS)
MA 2238/2025 in SLP(C) No. 18225/2024
Question(s):
(i) Whether the Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (“CANH”) constitutes "medical treatment" that can be lawfully withdrawn under the passive euthanasia framework.
(ii) Wh
⭐
🏛️ HC
? Cyber Law (IT Act)
W.P.(C) 8259/2026 & CM APPL. 39036/2026
The petitioners, Telegram FZ LLC and another, approached the Delhi High Court challenging blocking orders and directions issued by the Union of India under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The core legal question revolved around the validity of these blocking orders and the extent of intermediary liability and compliance requirements for foreign messaging platforms operating in India. The Delhi High Court reiterated that global intermediaries must adhere to Indian regulatory frameworks, particularly when national security, public order, or copyright infringement is concerned. The decision reinforces the state's power to regulate digital platforms and enforce compliance under the IT Act.
⭐
🏛️ SC
?? Election Law
2024 SCC OnLine SC 614 W.P.(C) No. 640/2025
The petitioners, Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and others, filed a writ petition seeking 100% verification of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips against the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) count, or alternatively, a return to the paper ballot system. The Supreme Court of India rejected these prayers, holding that the existing EVM-VVPAT system is robust, secure, and minimizes human error and manipulation. However, to enhance transparency and voter confidence, the Court introduced new safeguards, including the sealing of Symbol Loading Units and allowing runner-up candidates to seek technical verification of EVM microcontrollers.